The basic concept is centred around the use of UV 405 nm light being injected into a series of diamagnetic crystals that have been doped into fluorescence in a progressive linear sequence. As the UV light excites the crystal, moving electrons to a higher energy level, the diamagnetic moment increases momentarily until fluorescence occurs and the electron falls back to its original energy level. The increasing diamagnetic field will interact with any external magnetic field developing a tendency to move away from the source. The concept is that the moving excitation would develop a moving anti magnetic bubble that would pull the system with it when conducted in space.

 

 

This idea is based on our first pitch and roll diamagnetic system’s basic principals being tested in the ECOSAT satellite. This was a high energy method using a 980 NM, 250 MW laser heating a small part of a pyrolytic sheet (-400) resulting in a curie point hole into which the diamagnetic fields were reduced causing an imbalance in the field with the pyrolytic graphite sheet moving in the direction of the hole. With the florescence method a 1 to 5 mw 405 NM laser would be used to create the imbalance in the diamagnetic field moment. This will require the development of a new type of crystal such as doped diamond (-5.9) again a carbon based element. Depending on the amount and other impurities, the results would be similar to that seen in the original Blue John crystals.  At the same time the diamagnetic field will need to be enhanced possibly through the doping method. Developing the enhanced diamagnetic crystals with a susceptibility  hundreds to thousands of time stronger would also greatly benefit terrestrial application of this material for things such as mag-elev, new motors and aircraft. Some of the potential doping elements might be germanium iodide (-171), gallium sulfide (-80), arsenic iodide (-142), bismuth (-280), antimony iodide (-147), indium bromide (-107). These are just a suggestion as a point to start.  Some diamonds do show a blue florescence again the magnetic susceptibility should be tested and  A search indicates that the florescence may be caused by Boron (-6.7 to -59.9), the source of this should be investigated.

 

November 10/2015: A search for the cause of fluorescence in blue diamonds as it related to Born, has lead to a rather interesting and timely discovery. The two elements carbon and boron have been combined in Graphene, Boron Nitride “CHBN” as the basis of a photo reactive material for use in possible high speed semi conductors, see “Photo-induced Doping in Graphene/Boron Nitride Heterostructures “

 

http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v9/n5/abs/nnano.2014.60.html

 

The combining of the two materials using CVD (carbon vapour deposition) produces a band gap which Graphene on its own does not have. So the next step is to see if the new material has fluorescence when exposed to UV light and to see if the magnetic moment can be measured.

 

I want to give special thanks to Denis Scherk of Victoria, BC for the donation of two rings that contain fluorescent diamonds for this reasearch (blue and yellow). I really appreciate his donation. The next picture shows the rings:

 

 

And the blue ring under UV light:

 

 

UPDATE January 5th, 2016

The path to the simple test of the hypothesis

The continuing development of the linear quantum drive.

I think I have come up with a way to verify the above concept. The path to this has been long and winding through a variety of materials and research papers. pyrolytic graphite directed me to the study of quantum physics, bring bosons, magnons and phonons front and centre in the presentation of the photo electric effect as seen in the lattice structures of crystals. Out of this to the variation of the magnetic moment as a result of the introduction of UV light leading to florescence. Then after completing the Quantum physics course, I moved on to the study of graphene: the two dimensional expression of pyrolytic graphite (carbon). Here I found the reason for the unexpected stopping capability of pyrolytic graphite to Gamma rays. Both graphene and pyrolytic graphite can be made via Carbon Vapour Deposition “CVD” the heating of methane gas. Graphene is a single layer of carbon atoms forming in a hexagonal shape and each additional layer rotates approximately 87 degrees when locking onto the previous layer of carbon atoms. Taking this process to pyrolytic graphite with many thousands of layers leaves very little space for a Gamma Ray to pass through the lattice structure. It did turn out to be temperature critical that during formation that the temperature be maintained in the range of 2000 to 2200 degrees C for the highest magnetic susceptibility of the pyrolytic graphite of about – 400 x 10 -6, if formed near 2300 degrees you end up around -4 the value of normal carbon. This brings me back to fluorite and in particular Blue John that fluoresce under UV. The next step in the search for a super diamagnetic material that would fluoresce under UV light lead to African Blue Diamonds that had boron impurities causing fluorescence under UV. This in turn lead to the paper on graphene, boron nitride see on the AGO web site under the blog, “Photo-induced Doping in graphene/Boron Nitride Hetero-structures”

Photoinduced doping in heterostructures of graphene and boron nitride

The combining of the two materials using CVD (carbon vapour deposition) produces a band gap which graphene on its own does not have. This produces a new material that is useful as a light activated graphene semi conductor switch, (very fast computers). So the next step is to see if the new material has fluorescence when exposed to UV light and to see if the magnetic moment can be measured and enhanced.

To test the basic theory, I suggest the use of a magnetic SQUID magnetometer that measures magnetic susceptibility to the quantum level.

See the following paper on magnetic susceptibility, Overview of Methods for Magnetic Susceptibility

A blue diamond would be placed in the SQUID measurement device and the susceptibility would be measured. Continues monitoring the SQUID with a scope. Then you expose the diamond to a pulsed UV light, 360 to 405 NM while monitoring the reaction. I would suggest that a sudden increase in magnons would occur as the electrons energy level increases to the next level, then falls back to normal values as the diamond fluoresces. Some testing of the repetition rate and duration of the UV exposure would have to be explored. Nov 30th 2015 If this method works, it would be a good way to predict more elements that could be used to dope graphene in order to develop useful nano size computers. Diamonds fluoresce with different colours and what impurities causes what colour would help to quickly identify potential combinations. We have been offered the use of gem quality Blue Diamonds and others for none destructive testing. My question is what size would be best? Does anyone have a SQUID mag to do the testing?

 

Reference:

Diamagnetic Elements List

Overview of Methods for Magnetic Susceptibility Measurement

Electrically tunable transverse magnetic focusing in graphene

Photoinduced doping in heterostructures of graphene and boron nitride

Direct conversion of amorphous carbon into diamond at ambient pressures and temperatures in air

Novel phase of carbon, ferromagnetism, and conversion into diamond